The 2024 US presidential election concluded with a surprising victory for Republican nominee Donald Trump, sending shockwaves through the global climate community. Trump’s climate change skepticism, coupled with his stated intentions to dismantle existing environmental regulations and withdraw from the Paris Agreement, has raised serious concerns about the future of international efforts to combat climate change. This outcome contrasts sharply with the ambitions of the global community to limit warming to well below 2°C, preferably to 1.5°C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement. Key figures involved in the creation and implementation of the Paris Agreement have voiced their concerns, while emphasizing the continued global momentum toward clean energy despite this setback.

Trump’s Re-Election: A Blow to Global Climate Action

Reactions from Climate Leaders

The election result has elicited strong reactions from prominent climate leaders, signaling widespread concern. Laurence Tubiana, a key architect of the Paris Agreement, acknowledged the setback while emphasizing the agreement’s resilience and the strong economic momentum driving the global transition to clean energy. She noted that “the context today is ‘very different’ to Trump’s first election victory in 2016,” highlighting the significant progress made in renewable energy technology and the increasing public and political will for climate action in many parts of the world. She emphasized that “Europe now has the responsibility and opportunity to step up and lead,” signifying a potential shift in global leadership on climate action.

Tubiana’s Call for European Leadership

Tubiana’s statement underscores the importance of continued international cooperation despite the challenges presented by Trump’s re-election. She highlighted the devastating impact of recent hurricanes as a stark reminder that climate change impacts affect every American and called for Europe to lead the way in a “fair and balanced transition” that strengthens economies and builds resilience. This suggests a strategic shift in the approach to climate action, focusing on demonstrating the economic and social benefits of decarbonization to encourage global collaboration and counter Trump’s policies, rather than solely relying on international agreements.

Christiana Figueres, the former UN climate chief, similarly described the election outcome as a “major blow” but emphasized that it would not halt the ongoing decarbonization of the economy. She underscored the continuing competitiveness of clean energy technologies and the unwavering commitment of communities worldwide to climate action. Her statement, “Standing with oil and gas is the same as falling behind in a fast moving world,” powerfully illustrates the growing technological and economic advantages of transitioning to a clean energy future. This transition, she predicts, will naturally progress irrespective of political setbacks.

Figueres’ Emphasis on Ground-Level Action

Figueres’ focus on “action on the ground” offers a counterpoint to the larger, more political narrative. She highlights the sustained efforts of communities globally to regenerate their environments and build resilience to climate change impacts. This perspective underscores the decentralized nature of climate action, indicating that even amidst national-level setbacks, progress continues at the local and regional level. Her reference to the Earthshot Prize, an initiative focused on environmental innovation, reinforces this message focusing on concrete solutions rather than solely relying on international agreements or federal policy.

Implications for the Paris Agreement

The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, sets a global framework for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and limiting global warming. Trump’s stated intention to withdraw from the agreement represents a significant threat to its effectiveness. While the agreement’s framework remains intact, the loss of US participation would weaken its collective ambition and undermine the agreement’s ability to achieve its long-term climate goals particularly with the scale of emissions that the US generates.

The Resilience of the Paris Agreement

Despite the setback, the ongoing commitment of many other nations to the Paris Agreement, significant advances in clean energy technology, and the increasing public awareness of climate change suggest that there is significant resilience. The economic benefits of the global transition and a widespread recognition that effective climate action is crucial for sustainable economic growth remain significant factors which push for action, irrespective of specific political decisions at the national level in specific countries like the US.

Potential Domestic and International Impacts

Trump’s policies could significantly affect both domestic and international climate action. Domestically, reduced investment in clean energy and relaxed environmental regulations could lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions. Internationally, the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement could weaken international commitments towards climate mitigation. The US’s potential withdrawal undermines global collaborative efforts to effectively tackle the global climate crisis and limits collective ambition towards achieving the Paris Agreement’s goals.

Uncertainties and Challenges Ahead

The short-term impact of Trump’s re-election on global climate change efforts remains uncertain, but is anticipated to be substantially negative. The next four years will be a critical testing ground for the resilience of global commitments in environmental protection. While there is significant momentum at the subnational and international levels, there are also substantial challenges to overcome to counteract the negative impacts of this election outcome. The economic consequences of the change of direction in US policy, the potential undermining of US-led international collaborations, and the need for enhanced leadership from other nations represent key challenges.

The future trajectory of global climate action heavily depend on the actions taken by other nations and the degree of resilience exhibited by the broader global community. The outcome of the election does not signal a halt for all, rather it highlights the importance of sustained commitment, collaboration at all levels and international cooperation to counterbalance those national-level efforts that may not prioritize climate action.

Article Reference